Barker, Social Contract(Rousseau)

In Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau draws some interesting conclusions and adjudges some very interesting points active the dynamic that human beings have to go through when dealing with to distributively one other. His main points in the take hold have to do with the fact that hands ar not meant to be held down, nor or they meant to be restrained in any focusing. Instead, men were meant to run free and be able to make their own decisions as more as they possibly can.I have in mind that this book takes the completely complicated question of human nature and fags it down in a way that is a little bit easier to understand. The premiere and roughly prevalent point in the book is about how passel are not meant to be held down or restrained. According to the thoughts of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, freedom and indecorum are things that help both peck and societies thrive and survive. More than anything else, mickle desire this type of freedom because it makes them feel l ike they can do what they were meant to do.In my picture, this is a driving push for societies. Because of human nature and how we are wired, people are not meant at all to be held down and they are not meant to have to conform to what purchase order tells them to conform to. When a society feels like they are being held down or enslaved by some other group of people, it is just a natural thing to want to break free of that oppression and spread their wings. This book also takes an interesting odor at the role of government and how it impacts the way people treat each other.Like umpteen of the prevalent thinkers of his time, Rousseau holds onto the opinion that hulking government is a contain factor instead of being something that has a positive impact on the people it purports to help. With that in mind, government should be limited as much as possible, especially when there is a chance that some classify of corruption exists underneath the surface. I think this is a cynic al way to look at life, but given the circumstances that were around for Rousseau and many of his fellow thinkers, it is easy to see where one might be compelled to think this way.I dont think that it is necessarily healthy to hold onto this opinion in terms of todays government, but there are some very interesting lessons that can be gleaned. This book takes the hazard to touch on a number of political topics and how they affect people and it does not miss. The author obviously has a healthy fear of big government, which was super important during his time. I think that the consideration of force among peoples is an extremely important consideration, as well.Individuals can either conform to force as it confronts them or they can take the forces in their way and direct them. I think that it is difficult for most people to grasp having unnecessary force being put on them. As the author wrote in the first part of the book, men were not made to be enslaved, so that is not a natural thing for them to have to put up with. This pinch is essential to getting to know human beings and further, understanding society at large.