Discourse Analysis Essay

hold forth analysis (DA), or pretend-and- pee studies, is a general enclosure for a number of approaches to analyzing written, vocal, or sign language use or any signifi asst semiotic event. The objects of talk analysis converse, writing, conversation, communicative event, etc. ar variously defined in terms of coherent sequences of sentences, propositions, spoken communication acts or treats-at-talk. Contrary to much of traditional linguistics, communion analysts non sole(prenominal) study language use beyond the sentence boundary, exclusively also prefer to analyze naturally occurring language use, and not invented showcases. textbookbook linguistics is re upstartd. The essential difference mingled with converse analysis and text linguistics is that it aims at revealing socio-psychological characteristics of a mortal/persons rather than text structure.1 Discourse analysis has been taken up in a gentle man bod body of social science disciplines, including lingu istics, sociology, anthropology, social work, cognitive psychology, social psychology, international relations, human geography, communication studies, and translation studies, each of which is subject to its induce assumptions, dimensions of analysis, and methodologies.Topics of interestTopics of discourse analysis include* The various levels or dimensions of discourse, such as sounds (intonation, etc.), gestures, syntax, the lexicon, style, rhetoric, meanings, patois acts, moves, strategies, turnsand other aspects of interaction * Genres of discourse (various signs of discourse in politics, the media, education, science, business, etc.) * The relations amongst discourse and the emergence of syntactic structure * The relations between text (discourse) and context* The relations between discourse and power* The relations between discourse and interaction* The relations between discourse and cognition and retentivenessDiscourse AnalysisDeborah TannenDiscourse analysis is some ms defined as the analysis of language beyond the sentence. This contrasts with types of analysis more(prenominal) characteristic of modern linguistics, which are chiefly concerned with the study of grammar the study of scant(p)r bits of language, such as sounds (ph bingletics and phonology), parts of wrangle (morphology), meaning (semantics), and the order of words in sentences (syntax). Discourse analysts study larger chunks of language as they electric current unitedly. Some discourse analysts consider the larger discourse context in order to understand how it affects the meaning of the sentence.For example, Charles Fillmore points out that two sentences taken together as a single discourse can have meanings several(predicate) from each hotshot taken separately. To illustrate, he asks you to imagine two unconditional signs at a swimming pool Please use the toilet, not the pool, feel outs one. The other announces, Pool for members only. If you regard each sign independentl y, they seem sooner reasonable. But taking them together as a single discourse switchs you go back and revise your variant of the low gear sentence subsequently youve read the second.Discourse and FramesReframing is a focusing to talk about exhalation back and re-interpreting the meaning of the first sentence. Frame analysis is a type of discourse analysis that asks, What activity are verbalisers engaged in when they say this? What do they think they are doing by talk of the town in this flair at this time? Consider how hard it is to make sense of what you are hearing or reading if you dont know whos talking or what the general topic is. When you read a newspaper, you invite to know whether you are reading a news story, an editorial, or an advertising in order to properly interpret the text you are reading. years ago, when Orson Welles radio play The War of the Worlds was broadcast, some listeners who tuned in late panicked, thinking they were hearing the actual end of the world. They mistook the frame for news instead of drama.Turn-takingConversation is an enterprise in which one person announces, and another listens. Discourse analysts who study conversation note that speakers have systems for determining when one persons turn is over and the next persons turn begins. This exchange of turns or floors is signaled by such linguistic means as intonation, pausing, and phrasing. Some mountain await a clear pause earlier beginning to speak, but others assume that winding down is an invitation to someone else to take the floor. When speakers have variant assumptions about how turn exchanges are signaled, they may inadvertently interrupt or feel interrupted. On the other hand, speakers also ofttimes take the floor even though they know the other speaker has not invited them to do so. Listenership too may be signaled in diverse take careances.Some sight look for frequent nodding as intimately as listener feedback such as mhm, uhuh, and yeah. Less of this than you command can create the impression that someone is not listening more than you expect can give the impression that you are being speed along. For some, eye contact is expected nearly continually for others, it should only be intermittent. The type of listener response you get can change how you speak If someone seems uninterested or uncomprehending (whether or not they sincerely yours are), you may slow down, repeat, or overexplain, giving the impression you are talking down. Frederick Erickson has shown that this can occur in conversations between black and white speakers, because of different habits with regard to showing listenership.Discourse MarkersDiscourse markers is the term linguists give to the little words like well, oh, but, and and that break our speech up into parts and show the relation between parts. Oh prepares the hearer for a impress or just-remembered circumstance, and but indicates that sentence to follow is in opposition to the one bef ore. However, these markers dont necessarily mean what the dictionary says they mean. Some people use and just to start a new thought, and some people put but at the end of their sentences, as a way of trailing off gently. Realizing that these words can function as discourse markers is important to prevent the frustration that can be experienced if you expect every word to have its dictionary meaning every time its used.Speech ActsSpeech act analysis asks not what approach pattern the utterance takes but what it does. Saying I now pronounce you man and wife enacts a marriage. Studying speech acts such as complimenting allows discourse analysts to ask what counts as a compliment, who gives compliments to whom, and what other function they can serve. For example, linguists have observed that women are more likely both to give compliments and to get them. There are also cultural differences in India, politeness requires that if someone compliments one of your possessions, you should o ffer to give the item as a gift, so complimenting can be a way of asking for things. An Indian woman who had just met her sons American wife was shocked to hear her new daughter-in-law praise her beautiful saris. She commented, What kind of girl did he marry? She wants everything By comparing how people in different cultures use language, discourse analysts hope to make a constituent to improving cross-cultural understanding.How to do a discourse analysisThe first point to note is that in order to do a discourse analysis you motivating to have read a handful yourself first. By reading published articles that use the method, you will have a separate understanding of (1) how to do an analysis and (2) some of the theoretical orientations that you will need to know to do your own analysis. Having identified a theory and a chosen item (text or recorded conversation) to analyse, you need to transcribe it in one of the accepted/published ways. The transcript must always appear in the ap pendices. There are many different forms of discourse analysis, so here we will focus on thematic analysis as an example.What is thematic analysis?Thematic analysis is about trying to refer meaningful categories or themes in a body of data. By flavor at the text, the researcher asks whether a number of recurring themes can be abstracted about what is being said. For example, on one level you top executive find an inconsistency, an attempt to assign beatified, an attempt to pay heed others to support ones views, a regular interruption of other people, an attempt to make ones account of some event sound more authentic, and so on. On another level, you might idenitify a regulalry occurring attribution of blame or the repeated course credit to some specific cause of an event. The reference might take slightly different forms but refers to the same cause.An example might be football fans blaming various aspects of a players motivation for the failure of their team (e.g., he gets so much money, doesnt need to try, he looked as though he wasnt bothered, he didnt want the ball, and so on). In the results section of the report, the themes abstracted are collated and reported on. In doing so, it is usual to cite from the transcription examples of the points you are trying to make. A summary of the findings can be offered but also a critique of the authors own interpretations this refers to the concept of reflexivity, that the authors is only one interpretation of the text.