Revenue and Mitigation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Revenue and Mitigation - Essay Example Apparently, there are advantages and disadvantages associated with donations to the police and they must be weighed effectively, in order to determine the best possible option for effective community policing. One of the principal advantages is that donations can provide the extra revenue needed to fight crime. Further, the sponsorship drives can be used as platforms to enhance community awareness about the crime prevention projects and initiatives that the police are undertaking. Donations can also provide law enforcers with additional opportunities to interrelate with members of the public at social events. Disadvantageous implications of donations to the police include the donors thinking that they would get preferential treatment in case they break the law. In worst case scenarios, donation could distort priorities of the police, since they might feel obliged to serve donors first (Hess and Orthmann 492-493). Nonetheless, the pros of donations outweigh the cons, and the latter can be overcome with proper regulations in place. It would be possible to capitalize on the public’s good will, while upholding transparency of donations or sponsorship. For this reason, the police department is inviting community groups, councils and businesses to invest in its projects and initiatives, so as to establish a safer environment for all. The department guarantees that financial assistance received will aid in building and strengthening links with all stakeholders to facilitate crime reporting and prevention. Further, sponsorship will clearly align with the police force’s objectives of supporting cost effective measures to reduce crime. The force will uphold absolute integrity in all its dealings, in a setting of heightened accountability and scrutiny from the public. Members of any community have a significant role to play in prevention or coping with events that pose danger to their welfare or that of people close to them. Majority of hazard management